<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Padron Anniversary 1926 no.6 Vs 1964 Principe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cigars.ie/index.php/reviews/padron-anniversary-1926-no6-vs-1964-principe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cigars.ie/reviews/padron-anniversary-1926-no6-vs-1964-principe/</link>
	<description>Ireland's First Cigar Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oran</title>
		<link>http://cigars.ie/reviews/padron-anniversary-1926-no6-vs-1964-principe/comment-page-1/#comment-11406</link>
		<dc:creator>Oran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cigars.ie/?p=1113#comment-11406</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comparative review. I really enjoy these Padron Anniversary smokes, and have smoked both vitolas a handful of times. I personally found the 1926 more complex and enjoyable than the 1964 in this size. Great review, I look forward to checking out other comparisons from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comparative review. I really enjoy these Padron Anniversary smokes, and have smoked both vitolas a handful of times. I personally found the 1926 more complex and enjoyable than the 1964 in this size. Great review, I look forward to checking out other comparisons from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

